Short answer: yes, if you're a mid-market IT consulting firm (50+ employees) managing complex billing across multiple concurrent engagements. Here's the honest breakdown for 30-, 50-, and 100-person tech consulting firms.
Technology consulting firms operate differently from other professional services. Projects are often longer-horizon, billing structures are more complex (T&M vs fixed-fee vs hybrid), and the delivery model spans a wider range — from short advisory engagements to multi-month SaaS implementations. BigTime's PSA platform has to work across all of that.
This page gives you firm-size-specific answers: where BigTime works well for tech consulting, where it falls short, what it actually costs in year one, and how it compares to lighter-weight alternatives.
| 30-Person Firm | 50-Person Firm | 100-Person Firm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BigTime Fit Assessment | Potentially Overscaled | Strong Fit | Strong Fit |
| T&M Billing Complexity | ~ Manageable with smaller setup | ✓ Well-matched for multi-rate billing | ✓ Handles complex multi-tier billing |
| Multi-Project Resource Allocation | ~ Useful but may be overkill | ✓ Full RMS value at this scale | ✓ Essential for 50+ active engagements |
| SaaS Implementation Tracking | ✓ Solid project management | ✓ Strong phase/milestone tracking | ✓ Full implementation suite coverage |
| Year-One Total Cost | $18,000–$30,000 | $28,000–$55,000 | $55,000–$100,000 |
| Implementation Timeline | 6–8 weeks | 10–14 weeks | 14–20 weeks |
| Requires Dedicated Ops Resource? | Recommended | Yes — essential at this scale | Yes — 1–2 FTE ops lead needed |
| Agile/Scrum Sprint Tracking | ✗ Not natively supported | ✗ Requires third-party integration | ✗ Not natively supported |
| ROI Justifiable? | ~ Only if scaling to 40+ soon | ✓ Yes — strong utilization impact | ✓ Yes — clear margin visibility gains |
| WorkPulse as Alternative | ✓ Strong alternative at this size | ~ Viable if billing is less complex | ✗ BigTime wins at this scale |
Technology consulting firms typically bill with 3–5 different rate tiers per engagement: senior consultant, mid-level engineer, junior analyst, offshore resource. BigTime handles this natively — you can assign billing rates by employee, by project, or by project phase. This is a significant advantage over spreadsheet-based tracking where rate changes during a contract create billing errors and reconciliation overhead.
Tech consultants are frequently allocated across 3–5 projects simultaneously. Without a resource management tool, it's impossible to know who's truly available, who is over-allocated, and where utilization gaps exist. BigTime's Resource Management System (RMS) gives you a real-time capacity view by skill set and department. The limitation: it only works if consultants log time consistently. If your team treats time tracking as optional, the resource view is useless.
Cloud migration, Salesforce implementation, ServiceNow deployment — these projects have phase-based delivery with milestone billing. BigTime's project management module handles phase structures, task assignments, and milestone tracking well. Where it falls short: no native Agile/Scrum sprint board. If your delivery team runs two-week sprints, you'll need a third-party tool (Jira, Asana) and a manual sync process to keep BigTime's project data current.
For IT consulting firms running T&M contracts with not-to-exceed (NTE) values, BigTime's contract ceiling tracking prevents accidentally billing over the agreed cap. It flags when a project is approaching the ceiling and alerts project managers before over-billing happens. This is a meaningful feature for firms with large fixed-scope T&M engagements where scope creep is a constant risk.
| Cost Category | 30-Person Firm | 50-Person Firm | 100-Person Firm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software Licensing | $12,000–$20,000/yr | $20,000–$36,000/yr | $40,000–$72,000/yr |
| Implementation Consulting | $6,000–$12,000 | $12,000–$22,000 | $20,000–$35,000 |
| Staff Training Time | $4,000–$8,000 (lost utilization) | $8,000–$14,000 (lost utilization) | $15,000–$30,000 (lost utilization) |
| Data Migration | $1,000–$3,000 | $2,000–$5,000 | $4,000–$10,000 |
| Dual-System Overhead | $5,000–$8,000 (2–3 months) | $10,000–$18,000 (3–4 months) | $18,000–$35,000 (3–4 months) |
| Total Year-One Cost | $28,000–$51,000 | $52,000–$95,000 | $97,000–$182,000 |
The hidden cost most firms don't account for: time-tracking compliance. In IT consulting, consultants often work on proposals, presales, and internal projects that are non-billable. Getting them to log time accurately against all projects — including the non-billable ones — requires firm-wide behavioral change. Firms that don't enforce time entry see their utilization reports become unreliable, which undermines every downstream profitability analysis.
The Margin Diagnostic ($149, one-time) uploads 13 weeks of timesheet and billing data and delivers a full AI analysis: project profitability ranking, utilization trend, concentration flags, and top recommendations — grounded in your actual numbers. Particularly useful for tech consulting firms evaluating BigTime or any PSA platform and wanting to understand what you're already making on each client before signing a contract.
Upload your existing timesheet data. Get a clear view of your project profitability — before you commit to a 3-month implementation.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yes — for mid-market firms (50–100 employees) running multiple concurrent projects with a mix of T&M, fixed-fee, and milestone billing. BigTime handles the billing complexity that IT consulting firms deal with — high hourly rates, mixed contract structures, and project-based revenue recognition — better than most competitors. The PSA suite covers time tracking, resource planning, project financials, and invoicing in one platform. The catch: implementation runs $15,000–$35,000 and takes 10–16 weeks. Smaller IT firms (under 40 employees) often find BigTime over-featured and overpriced for their needs.
Yes. BigTime's billing engine handles multiple rate structures per project, per employee, and per client — which is exactly what IT consulting firms need when they bill T&M with blended or role-based rates. You can set up project-specific billing rules (e.g., senior consultant at $275/hr, junior at $145/hr), track against contract ceiling values, and run utilization reports by employee and project. The billing flexibility is one of BigTime's strongest features for tech consulting. The limitation: if your engagements involve hybrid T&M + milestone billing on the same contract, expect configuration work during implementation to get the invoicing rules right.
BigTime's resource management module is one of its strongest features for technology consulting firms with consultants juggling 3–6 projects simultaneously. The capacity planning view shows who is allocated where, utilization by project, and flagging when consultants are over-allocated. You can build skill-based resource pools (cloud architects, data engineers, security specialists) and assign based on availability rather than guessing. The catch: it requires accurate data entry from every consultant and at least one person maintaining the resource views. Firms that don't enforce consistent time entry see the resource planning degrade quickly, which undermines the whole purpose.
Yes — it's one of BigTime's better use cases. A 50-person IT consulting firm typically has enough project diversity and billing complexity to justify the platform's feature depth. Multiple clients, mixed billing structures, and 20–30 active projects is exactly the scale where BigTime's resource planning, project financials, and invoicing modules pay for themselves. Year-one cost runs roughly $28,000–$55,000 including implementation and training. The ROI is justified if you're managing utilization and profitability across multiple concurrent engagements.
BigTime's project management layer handles SaaS implementation tracking through its task and milestone management tools. You can structure implementations in phases (discovery, configuration, UAT, go-live), assign tasks to team members, and track progress against the project timeline. For firms doing Salesforce, ServiceNow, or SAP implementations, the project management work is solid. The gaps: no native Agile/Scrum sprint tracking, no integrated timesheet approval workflows for distributed teams, and limited document management for SOWs and change orders. These are typically handled through integrations or third-party tools. If your delivery model is Agile-heavy, this is a meaningful gap.
Realistic year-one cost for a 30–100 person technology consulting firm is $28,000–$182,000 total — not just software licensing. That includes implementation consulting, staff training time, and data migration. The hidden cost most firms miss: 2–4 months of parallel-system operation during transition. A 50-person IT firm losing 8–10 hours/week per consultant for 12 weeks is roughly $80,000–$120,000 in unrealized billing. Budget for the full picture, not just the software license. The operational cost of learning a new system often exceeds the software cost by 3–5x.
The exact 5 metrics that separate 40%+ margin firms from the rest — for professional services owners evaluating their ops stack.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.